Election officials are no strangers to doing more with less, but navigating tight budgets while increasingly serving as de facto IT managers has introduced an evolving challenge. Because election events happen periodically, election infrastructure security can easily be overlooked during regular budget cycles—even though cyber threats operate year-round. For most election offices, securing the necessary resources is not just a technical issue, but an ongoing challenge of communication, stakeholder alignment, and preparation.
What’s actually the hurdle? The language gap. To an election official, unaddressed system gaps and legacy tools represent critical operational hazards; to a budget committee, technical jargon can make these requests look like discretionary IT spending. Successful funding conversations depend on translating technical needs into clear, compelling priorities that resonate with decision-makers. That means framing cybersecurity not as an IT line item, but as a direct safeguard against service outages, legal liability, costly incident responses, and the erosion of voter confidence.
The guide outlines six practical steps to bridge this divide. It details how to conduct baseline assessments to break needs into clear, fundable components, engage and align key stakeholders across finance and procurement before budget cycles close, and apply a simple decision-making framework to evaluate risks, impacts, and trade-offs.
Cybersecurity is an ongoing operational requirement, not a one-time purchase or an isolated election-year expense. This resource equips election officials to present right-sized funding options, articulate the cost of inaction, and build the cross-departmental credibility needed to sustain resilient election systems over the long haul.
Download